Editorial Assembly / Updated: 2024-08-27
Recently the American presidential election news had been occupying the headlines, even in Australia.
Australians have to take note on American elections, since they influence us in a great deal. If the progressives win America, then progressives will win Australia. Same vice versa.
But now there is a change. Everywhere in the world, we see the so called "far right" getting into power. And in the US, they call this "demise of the establishment".
Are there any links between the two? Certainly there is. The definition of "far right" is simple: he whoever hold and express his political position because he genuinely believes it, not because he was paid to do so, is "far-right". Simply put, "far-right" is for people, while any others are for commercial or deep state interests. That is why when you talk to any random person, it always feel like talking to a far right; and whenever there is a riot, it is almost safe to say, it is the far-right riot. And of course, this will not stop far-right getting into power because they generally reflect the people's will better.
So, who get paid to hold political positions? One example is the LNP of Australia. Many Aussies would take note that it is almost the official stance for the party to insist that George Pell was innocent. This stance goes against 99% of Australian people, so it is clearly that the Catholic Church had paid them to hold this stance. For this reason, even if they past laws to go against the gender diversity groups, LNP are still considered "moderate" right wing, not the far right at all.
So as both the typical left and typical right do the politics for money, not for people, you wouldn't expect them to devote themselves too much to any political ideologies, because that would be considered "extremism", isn't it?
Yet at the same time, don't underestimate their eagerness to devastate their opponents either. Don't forget most wars happened on this planet was purely about resource and money, not about ideologies.
Except, they had been shy in using the "nuclear weapon": revealing their opponent as part of an organised pedo ring.
While it is true that sometimes you hear some politicians using parliament privilege to accuse someone as a pedophile, but they always stop short on how the organized ring extended to the wider political, judicial and even commercial circles, since mentioning that means invoking the nukes.
Make no mistakes, due to the prolific activities of these rings, if you are in any sort of dealing with the government, it is really difficult to come clean and say you are not associate with those pedophiles at all. It is just too prolific, so long as you are part of the establishment, you are part of it. And this is one of the reason people don't want this "establishment" at all, it is completely compromised and corrupt.
But on the other hand, different political factions in power hold leverages over each other too on this topic. And they never throw these things into the eyes of the public, otherwise it will result in a mutual assured destruction of the entire political establishment.
So that is why they remain "peaceful" and take turns to get into power, and pretend to run the country effectively.
Happy endings? Not at all. This means they have to work together to cover up ALL child abuse cases in the elite circle to ensure the effectiveness of their "political nukes", or the effectiveness of mutual assured destruction, or simply avoid going to jail themselves.
We all knew that this "nuke", if launched, will only hurt the corrupt politicians. We the people will not be harmed at all; plus the victims will all get their justice.
So how to let them "launch this nuke" and expose everything? I remember a few stories that during the cold war, any civilian rocket launch could be mistaken as nukes, and there had been multiple occasions that nuke war almost broke out due to this. Those were all horrible stories of the past, but it could inspire us the people as well.
Just remember, the presumptuous and arrogant ruling class always thought that whenever there is a political movement, it must be the work of the political establishment, perhaps on the other side if they were not briefed. "People are just too incompetent to get anything working", they thought. So next time, if you go to the street, handing out flyers on a busy street telling people about the corrupt dealings of government in child abuse, they will genuinely believe that their political opponents have initialized an all out attack: you now have the chance to spark a "nuclear war" between different pedo rings - a war that doesn't hurt decent people - and also the chance to bring the justice to numerous victims.
So, what are you waiting for? hit the streets and hand out flyers now!
Let others know this website
Former radio broadcaster, AO, Fell in love with boy at elite private school
They rather spent all money on lawyers to delay cases than paying victims
Answer is not that hard if you bring back the moral standards for judgement
NSW education department cover up to reduce payout money to victims
Cracking down disinformation? No, they want to crackdown activists and whistle blowers
Hitler always wanted to be a painter. His work is... just OK. You won't compare them to that of da ...
In March 2015, heritage-listed St James Catholic Church in Brighton was mostly destroyed by fire and ...
If you want an example of the complete moral collapse of the "mainstream media", one doesn't have to ...
I have done a quick look up of a list basic human rights we ought to have, basically they are lined ...
Our Enemy is very powerful. In order to stage a fight, we must set aside differences and seek common ground. For website link exchange please contact us.
© 2024 Eureka Q Australia | We see you. We hear you. We believe you.